1- I have read an old narration which is that the Messenger (PBUH&HF) was having cupping. After cupping, he…
1- I have read an old narration which is that the Messenger (PBUH&HF) was having cupping. After cupping, he poured the rest of the blood, it was taken by perhaps Um Salma (may Allah be pleased with her) or another woman. She drank the remaining blood which the Messenger (PBUH&HF) poured on the ground. The Messenger (PBUH&HF) said to Um Salama or the other woman "why did you do that?" they said "it can be for blessing". The Messenger (PBUH&HF) said, “As long as you drank blood, no harm will ever happen to you, but do not do this thing again.” The same content of this story is in the books of the opponents, but it is mentioned, according to them, that a man took the remaining blood from the Messenger, not a woman, and did not drink it. Is the narration true, mentioned in the books? I saw someone talking about it, but I don't know from which books, so please could you look for the authenticity of the narration? 2-There is another story that the Messenger (PBUH&HF) took a bar and hit an animal, but he did not notice, so he hit a sheikh who said: "O Messenger of Allah, you hit me on my stomach. The Messenger exposed his pure belly and said, “Should you punish or forgive me?” The man stood up and kissed the belly of the Messenger and said: “I forgive you, Messenger of Allah.” The Messenger said "O Allah, forgive Souda ibin Qais as he forgave your Prophet Muhammad." Is this narration authentic? Does this mean that if this man commits a sin, and will be forgiven, he will be in Paradise, no matter what his sins are, as long as the Messenger, according to the narration, said, it means Allah forgives you. The Messenger did say that he must not commit the sin, because his supplication does not work, if the man does not repent. Rather, he asserted saying: Allah Almighty will forgive Souda bin Qais no matter what his sins are, because the Messenger prayed for him according to our understanding of the narration. What is your opinion?
Answer
In the name of Allah, all narrations are weak in terms of authenticity of transmission and include the Prophet’s consent to eating forbidden foods, especially the narration that relates the story of Souda ibin Qais, for it includes the issuance of disobedience and injustice by the Prophet (PBUH&HF) - and may Allah forbid - in the case of negligence, it has been proven that all prophets (PBUT) and the Messenger (PBUH&HF) who is the most honorable of them, are infallible from every sin, whether it was intentional or by mistake. Allah is the all Guide.
Source:alnajafy.com · alnajafy.com
Comments (0)
No comments yet.