A person who borrowed a certain amount of money refused to pay it back. The lender took him to court to…
A person who borrowed a certain amount of money refused to pay it back. The lender took him to court to recover the debt. The court ruled in favor of the lender. Accordingly, the borrower had to pay back the debt; he also paid a tax for law enforcement. Is the lender responsible for that according to shar‘?
Answer
If the procrastinating debtor has to pay the tax of law enforcement, the creditor is liable to nothing in this regard.
Source:leader.ir · leader.ir
Comments (0)
No comments yet.